Tuesday, 3 March 2009

Dr Orly Taitz may be on the home straight, helped by Obama himself!

Dr Taitz has filed a Pre-Litigation letter to Attorney General Holder, with plaintiffs who would appear to have "standing" to file suit against Barack Obama for disclosure of his documents relating to his eligibility to be POTUS.

"Attorney General, Eric H. Holder Jr.

U.S. Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20530-0001 USA

March 1, 2009

Honorable Attorney General Holder

Re: Request a Special Assistant for the United States to relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama, II to Test His Title to President before the Supreme Court

Relators, Major General Carroll Childers, Ret; Lt. Col Dr. David Earl-Graef; Navy and Police officer Mr. Clinton Grimes; Lt. Scott Easterling, currently serving in Iraq; Major James Cannon, US Marine Corps, Ret; New Hampshire State Representative Mr. Timothy Comerford; Tennessee State Representative Mr. Frank Nicely, State of Alabama 2008 electoral college elector Mr. Robert Cusanelli bring information for Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama, II, testing his title to President per attached relation. Relators include:

Robert Cusanelli, Elector for 7th District, State of Alabama, in the 2008 Electoral College;

Frank Nicely, State Representative of Tennessee in his official capacity;

Timothy Comerford, State Representative of New Hampshire in his official capacity;

Major General Carroll Childers, 29th Infantry Div VA retired, lifetime subject to recall; Numerous decorations

1st Lt. Scott R. Easterling OD LG US Army on active duty in Iraq;

Clint Grimes, Sergeant Long Beach Police Officer & CDR/0-5 US Navy (Active Reserve). Numerous decorations, including two National defense medals, two Navy commendation medals

Dr. David Earl-Graef, Lieutenant Colonel Air Force MC, Military Surgeon- Active Reserve. Numerous decorations including Air Force outstanding unit with valor.

James Cannon Major US Marine Corps, Ret, lifetime subject to recall. Numerous awards, including Bronze Star with combat V and two Purple Hearts

Relator’s oath of office grants standing. Relators are affected by actions of Respondent Obama and the outcome of this Quo Warranto, and thus have interest above citizens.

Information on Quo Warranto against a Federal Officer is normally related to the Attorney General to raise on behalf of the United States in U.S. District court of the District of Columbia per DC Code 16-3502. However, the Attorney General defends the office of President and is appointed by the President. For the Attorney General to bring Quo Warranto on the President raises an intrinsic conflict of interest. USAM 3-2.170 Historically, a Special Prosecutor or Independent Counsel was appointed to eliminate such conflicts of interest, e.g., Attorney General Elliot Richardson appointed Archibald Cox as the Watergate Special Prosecutor over issues touching on President Nixon.

This information on Quo Warranto includes action between the United States ex rel. and the State of Hawaii over original birth records of Barack H. Obama II being withheld per Hawaii’s privacy laws. Hawaii’s action obstructs the constitutional duties of election officers to validate or evaluate President Election Obama qualifications to become President under U.S. CONST. art II - 1 and Amend. XX – 3.

As President Elect, Respondent Obama failed to submit prima facie evidence of his qualifications before January 20, 2009. Election officers failed to challenge, validate or evaluate his qualifications. Relators submit that as President Elect, Respondent Obama failed qualify per U.S. CONST. Amend. XX – 3.

Such negligence and misprision threaten to nullify these essential safeguards. Thus Relators request this Quo Warranto be related to the Supreme Court under its original jurisdiction.

Enclosed is a summary motion for leave to file Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama II aka Barry Soetoro, with the Supreme Court. The list of Questions Presented is attached. A full brief supporting this motion is in preparation.

1) Relators respectfully pray that the Attorney General recuse himself over bringing this Quo Warranto for the United States on Barack H. Obama II, by reason of intrinsic conflict of interest.

2) Relators pray the Attorney General appoint a Special Assistant (prosecutor) of Archibald Cox’s reputation and expertise, to relate this Quo Warranto to the Supreme Court per 28 USC 543.

3) Relators request that their attorney, Orly Taitz, ESQ DDS, assist in relating this Quo Warranto, being recognized at bar before the Supreme Court.

4) Relators further request the assistance of Patrick Fitzgerald, United States Attorney General for the Northern District of Illinois, as having familiarity with issues involving Barack H. Obama II while Senator from Illinois and as President Elect.

5) Relators request guidance from the Attorney General, within one week of receipt of this information, regarding his decision on whether to appoint such a Special Assistant.

With respect, in absence of such guidance, Relators will proceed to request leave from the Supreme Court to relate information for this Quo Warranto on Mr. Obama to test his title.

Yours Sincerely,

Orly Taitz, ESQ

Attorney for Relators

Encl. Motion to Supreme Court for leave to relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama II, testing his title to the Federal office of President."


When Philip Berg filed suit against Barack Obama last year, demanding that Obama produce his birth certificate and prove his eligibility to be president of the United States, the suit was dismissed for Berg's "lack of standing," to bring such an action. Dozens of other suits have been filed, none of which seems to have progressed very far, either for lack of standing or bureaucratic stalling. Dr Taitz now has 101 plaintiffs, 9 of whom are serving military people, 3 in Iraq, and some on active recall.

If officers of the military, active or on active recall, whose lives can be affected by the president's decisions as Commander in Chief do not have standing, then who does? Who has the right to challenge the person sitting in the White House as president? In my opinion, Barack Obama should show respect for the citizens of his country and just produce the documents which are being requested.

Anyway, folks, a very interesting post on the Lame Cherry blog yesterday. It appears that Barack Obama and his unworthy crew may not have the foresight to see how a certain action may have repercussions for the president. In releasing memos written by George Bush, Obama seems to have opened the way for Dr Orly Taitz's lawsuit since Obama has waived presidential executive privilege. I will post the Lame Cherry article as it stands, rather than try to paraphrase it. Well worth a careful read!

Lame Cherry blogspot

"I highly doubt the lawyers taking up the Obama eligibility cases have noticed that Barack Obama has just laid their golden goose egg in the most inept decision of his administration led by his Justice Department in Eric Holder.

What I mean by this is today in a malevolent, low grade prick move, of leftist origins, Barack Obama released a ton of Bush White House memos concerning executive policy decisions.
Executive privilege is something all Presidents guard with their last breaths, because all executives have something to hide as being President is a dirty job. This is the reason all Presidents in protecting their own future butts with both hands do not ever release past Presidential workings.

Barack Obama though has done just that in a mean spirited, liberal, cutting off your nose to spite your own face. Obama and the goons "think" they are setting a political fire to once again deflect heat from them and instead focus it on George W. Bush to feed him as meat to the liberal press as a continuing Davide Letterman hate object.
The problem in this which I doubt anyone has noticed is Barack Obama by doing this, releasing personal memos, executive discussions and decisions, has opened up his entire political entree in everything he has done since he decided to be President as that is Executive which has legal precedent concerning Richard Nixon in the Committee to Re Elect the President.

See by Birdie Obama doing what he did, now all the smear and quip pro quo which the Obama camp engaged in against John Edwards where the press was fed information to go after Edwards instead of Obama's sexcapades is open to freedom of information.
This means Lawrence Sinclair has legal right to all of Barack Obama notes, files and memos concerning him and anything Obama, his staff or "outsiders" contracted to engage in, for the courts to pour through and find.
This means that Barack Obama's birth certificate, passport, college records, writings from college and all personal information are now subject to access to courts as he was waived the executive and personal privilege right by releasing Bush documents.

Barack Obama is an idiot and I would personally like to thank him for his and his people's political suicide binge they are intent upon for themselves.

As Obama has executive problems in court actions he is now engaged in, this brings this all into the White House in past history which was protected under the law, such as passports and college records. Every last detail is now subject to subpoena and Freedom of Information Act.
The only records the Citizen nor courts can get their hands on are National Security issues, and, there is no way Lawrence Sinclair, Obama's passport, John Edwards or just what Joe Biden did o secure his choice of jobs with Obama is covered.
There are now no confidential conversations nor memos as Obama has waved this for George Bush 43 when Obama leaked to the press confidential conversations and now with the release of Presidential documents.

So Orly Taitz and company, the balls are bouncing in your court. There are legal precedents from Richard Nixon being hounded to now Barack Obama handing the entire game to those seeking to find the Truth on Birdie Obama.

Thanks Birdie, but I still doubt these chickens have figured out the egg you just laid.



Anonymous said...

Dammit! Orly & co. have done nothing with this as of yet (March 5)
My impatience is vexing me!!

AnnaEsse said...


I thought the process was well underway, but no? If I feel frustration about Oscammer and his missus squatting the White House, I can imagine what so many people in the US must be feeling.

Anonymous said...

Are you an American citizen? If not go shove your head in an english hole and suffocate

AnnaEsse said...

Ah, good morning anonymous. I never know how to address you nameless ones, especially those using proxy servers to disguise their ISP. So, I'll just say please accept a kind return of your sentiments.

Anonymous said...

Isn't it true that ANYONE can request info based on FOIA? What is the procedure.

AnnaEsse said...

It seems that to obtain info about certain people, you need, "standing," in the US. I don't know if we would be able to obtain Gordon Brown's birth certificate here in the UK, but I would assume that he has proven himself to be eligible to hold the office of PM.

It seems that in the US, there is no one and no organisation which is ultimately responsible for making sure that candidates are eligible. So, basically, no one did a proper check on Barack Obama.

Philip Berg was said not to have "standing," but there are quite a few more suits pending and hopefully some of the plaintiffs will have standing.

Anonymous said...

Lefties make America look bad.A crude bunch at best.