Obama: now he insults disabled people. What a nerd!!

On the Jay Leno show, Barack Obama's joke about the "Special Olympics." This is totally ignorant and absolutely unacceptable behaviour from someone who is not only a qualified lawyer, but someone who has worked as a community organiser and a man who should know, therefore, about human rights and dignity. What a nerd! And this is the president of the United States. How low can he go? Rhetorical question, folks!



And as a contrast, which should make Obonkers cringe with shame, and which probably won't, this video shows Sarah Palin with her child who has Down's Syndrome, talking about her hopes for him, in an address to the 2009 Special Olympics in Boise, Idaho. I am lost for anything else to say here. I am so furious about President Hussein's remarks about the Special Olympics. He has brought his crass Chicago "wide boy," ways to Washington.



Sarah Palin, you're a star, a national treasure for the United States and a champion for disabled children everywhere. You recognise the potential to excel in every child and I salute you with admiration from the bottom of my heart.

The McCann Million Dollar Challenge

Tom Franks is a Texan millionaire, who has issued a challenge to the McCanns: show the evidence that could prove that the man in the police sketches could have abducted Madeleine, and he will give 1 million dollars to the Find Madeleine Fund.

McCann Million Dollar Challenge

"A case that needs to be answered

I first became aware of the case of Madeleine McCann in September 2007. I saw a report on CNN that the parents were suspected of killing their child. That was not a surprise, because in most cases where a very young child disappears the parents or guardians are involved. I cannot say I took a lot of interest in this case until very recently. In my business (Real Estate) I have one or two contacts in England. Last week one of these contacts sent me a copy of a letter and a book What Really Happened to Madeleine McCann that showed that Mr. and Mrs. McCann were never charged with any crime, not even child neglect, despite overwhelming evidence. Many believe this situation was a direct result of interference by the British media and political machine."

Read more.

My million dollar challenge to Gerry McCann

A reminder of some facts:

1/ A woman called Gail Cooper was on vacation in Portugal before you even arrived there. She says she saw a man collecting money for charity. Does that make him a child abductor? No. She says she saw a man on the beach when it was raining. Does that make him a child abductor? No. She says the man gave her the "creeps" because of the way he looked. Does that make him a child abductor? No. It means she might need to get out more, but no reason to believe he had anything to do with Madeleine.

2/ One of your vacation chums, Jane Tanner, states she did not see the face of the man she conveniently claims she saw, so I am not going to have you tell me she saw the same man Gail Cooper saw. She plainly would not know if it was the same man, if she had seen the face.

3/ On your website you display two pictures of the man your pal conveniently claims she saw and two pictures of the other man Mrs. Cooper says she saw.

You clearly want all of us to think the man Mrs. Cooper saw is the same as the one your vacation pal claims she saw and you want us to believe he is "Madeleine's probable abductor."

My Challenge

I challenge you to produce compelling evidence that shows Mrs. Cooper's man probably abducted Madeleine. I need either forensic evidence, very strong circumstantial evidence or witness evidence. I don't think you have evidence to prove that Mrs. Cooper's man probably abducted your daughter. You also have no evidence the man your vacation buddy conveniently claims she saw probably abducted Madeleine.

I think it is something you invented and you knowingly had a lie published on your website. Don't pretend you are unaware it is on your website. What parent with a lost child would not look at their own website designed to find their child? I think you are a liar. A controlling man like yourself would know fully well what is on your website.

If I am wrong and you can provide the forensic, strong circumstantial or witness evidence to substantiate your claim that the man probably abducted Madeleine, I will donate $1,000,000 to your fund. You can use that to pay your mortgage in full and take another vacation. Hopefully you will come back this time with as many children and you leave with.

You can either accept my challenge and publish the evidence on your website or decline my challenge and remove your lies from your website. The choice is yours, but the longer your lies remain on your website the more people will become aware you are a liar.

If you cannot accept my challenge, others will ask why not. Others will ask why you have lied. Why have you pretended to the public a man probably abducted Madeleine when you have no evidence to support that claim?

Others will know you are a liar. Others will wonder why you lied. I can only think of one reason why you would lie, because you want to create a smokescreen, a diversion from what really happened.

You are collecting money from the public on your website based on the claim that Mrs. Cooper's man probably abducted Madeleine. If you cannot substantiate that claim and it transpires you have lied, you had better pay every cent back to those you have taken money from, because that would make you both a thief and a liar.

Tom Franks 03/18//09

We The People Stimulus Package

A brilliant video from "We The People."

ACORN: charged with voter fraud but helping with the next US census!

John Lott Blog

17/03/09

"The U.S. Census is supposed to be free of politics, but one group with a history of voter fraud, ACORN, is participating in next year's count, raising concerns about the politicization of the decennial survey.

The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now signed on as a national partner with the U.S. Census Bureau in February 2009 to assist with the recruitment of the 1.4 million temporary workers needed to go door-to-door to count every person in the United States -- currently believed to be more than 306 million people.

A U.S. Census "sell sheet," an advertisement used to recruit national partners, says partnerships with groups like ACORN "play an important role in making the 2010 Census successful," including by "help[ing] recruit census workers." . . .

ACORN = The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now

From the, "Who is ACORN," page on the ACORN web site:

"Service delivery: ACORN and its allied organizations provide extensive services to our members and constituency. These include free tax preparation focusing on the Earned Income Tax Credit; screening for eligibility for federal and state benefit programs; and, through the ACORN Housing Corporation, first time homeowner mortgage counseling and foreclosure prevention assistance, and low income housing development.

Ballot initiatives: ACORN-backed ballot-initiative campaigns in 2006 helped raise the minimum wage in Ohio, Arizona, Missouri and Colorado, working with community-faith-labor coalitions on successful campaigns in each state.

Voter participation: Since 2004, ACORN has helped more than 1.7 million low- and moderate-income and minority citizens apply to register to vote."

It is this last item, Voter participation, which is under scrutiny. Across the USA, ACORN registered thousands upon thousands of new voters during the Obama election campaign. In the past, ACORN employees have been convicted of voter fraud. In the most recent presidential election campaign, ACORN has apparently registered dead people to vote, submitted thousands of obviously fraudulent registration forms, many with the same handwriting, and it seems that from the zip code, there are people living in take-away food places and even, somehow, in the middle of rivers.

So, that's what ACORN is. In addition to voter fraud, ACORN has also been accused of fraud and embezzlement. Yet, this organisation has been enlisted by the Federal government of the USA to help with the 2010 census.

This is a CNN video about ACORN from October 2008.



So, how come this organisation, which claims to be independent, receiving funding from donations and memberships, but which was actually receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Obama campaign, and is accused of voter fraud, is now signed up as a partner organisation for the next census? The results of the census are very important in deciding on representation in Congress and on allocation of Federal funds. So, it seems like a rather risky business to enlist ACORN while it is under investigation for voter fraud. Should such an organisation be helping to recruit the workers who will be responsible for distributing and collecting census forms and for assisting some elements of the community to complete their forms?

In the UK, these census officers are called, "enumerators," and part of the job is to help people, who for one reason or another, have difficulty with the forms: language, literacy, sight problems and other disabilities. I think we can assume that the job is similar in the US, the intention being that no one is left out because of barriers to communication. However, this is, as is probably obvious, open to fraud and manipulation by those officers helping to complete the forms. Is this a risk worth taking and why has the Obama administration opted to enlist the help of ACORN, while ACORN is suspected of illegal activity?

Anjem Choudary: When we say 'innocent people,' we mean Muslims

Above: Anjem Choudary in his student days; soft porn mags and a table laden with alcoholic drinks.

Anjem, aka Andy Choudary, knocking back the cheap cider.

"One former friend said: 'I can't keep a straight face when I see "fundamentalist Muslim Anjem Choudary" in the papers attacking the British for drinking or having girlfriends.

'When I knew him, he liked to be called Andy, would often smoke cannabis spliffs all day, and was proud of his ability to down a pint of cider in a couple of seconds." ( Daily Mail)

"And he was ruthless with girls. When he briefly worked as an English teacher for foreign students in London, he'd pull one of them every few days, sleep with her, then move on to another.

'If Sharia law was introduced, he would have been whipped and stoned to death many times over.'

Choudary, who was born in South-East London to a market stall-holder of Pakistani descent, has become one of the faces of extremist Islam."

And Choudary now! "Anyone who becomes intoxicated by alcohol would be given 40 lashes in public." I guess you wouldn't want to make that retrospective, Mr Choudary!

Above: Anjem Choudary leading the hateful protest that insulted UK troops parading through the streets of Luton.



Anjem Choudary being interviewed in January 2007 about the 7/7 bombings. He said, "When we say 'innocent people,' we mean Muslims. As far as non-Muslims are concerned, they have not accepted Islam and as far as we are concerned, that is a crime against God."

So, remember, folks, when a Muslim says they would never kill innocent civilians, they mean Muslims. They don't mean the rest of us because by their definition we are not innocent, because we have not accepted Islam. Forked tongue?

And here, below, is Mr Choudary's religion of peace, his fellow Muslims getting worked up and aggressive after a police officer asks to speak to someone who is chanting hatred from a megaphone in a moving vehicle. The police are there to keep order on our streets. They have every right to ask someone to be quiet, when that person appears to be inciting a riot, as the person in the vehicle appeared to be doing. Yet, there on our streets, a Muslim horde cornered a group of police officers, with shouts of, "How dare you." How dare they? They are doing their job, keeping law and order, preventing a breach of the peace, which they have every right to do, a right which is given to them under the law of our land.



UK Muslims outside London's Westminster (Catholic) Cathedral, shouting hatred, shouting threats against Pope Benedict, saying those who insulted Islam should be subject to capital punishment, and there is Anjem Choudary on the megaphone yet again. July 2007. In the interview, which is included in this video, Choudary is asked if he doesn't believe in democracy. His answer, "No, I don't at all. I believe we must live according to the Sharia." Yet, Choudary and his fellow preachers of hate seem to be forgetting that they only have the right to say those things because they are living in a democracy.


Isn't it time to say enough is enough. The Australian Prime Minister was brave enough to tell Muslims that they were living in a country based on the Christian faith and on democracy and if the Muslims didn't like that, if they couldn't accept the ways of the country, they should take advantage of that other great freedom afforded by Australian democracy, the freedom to leave and find a country that better suited their expectations. Let's get these preachers of hate and violence off our streets. It's high time our government took a firm stand and imposed the law on people who incite hatred and violence. Clean our streets of this vile horde. We've had enough.

Obama: 48 years without releasing any documents.

http://obambi.wordpress.com/

December 7th, 2008

Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints — none!

There is no Obama documentation — no records — no paper trail — None.

Original, vault copy birth certificate — Not released

Certificate of Live Birth — Released — Counterfeit

Obama/Dunham marriage license — Not released

Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not released

Soetoro adoption records — Not released

Fransiskus Assisi School School application — Released

Punahou School records — Not released

Selective Service Registration — Released — Counterfeit

Occidental College records — Not released

Passport (Pakistan) — Not released

Columbia College records — Not released

Columbia thesis — Not released

Harvard College records — Not released

Harvard Law Review articles — None (maybe 1, unsigned?)

Baptism certificate — None

Medical records — Not released

Illinois State Senate records — None

Illinois State Senate schedule — Lost

Law practice client list — Not released

University of Chicago scholarly articles — None

Binyan Mohamed was traveling on a false passport, and he wondered why the British authorities needed to be involved in investigating his background!

"In the first interview since his release, Mohamed, an Ethiopian refugee who worked as a cleaner at a West London mosque, released memos which reveal MI5 fed questions to his interrogators."

Daily Telegraph 10/03/09

So, MI5 fed questions to his interrogators. Let's think about why they might have done that.

"He said he wanted to go to Chechenya as an aid worker but was told he would need "basic training" and and joined an Afghan camp for six weeks."

"He was arrested in Pakistan in April 2002 as he tried to fly back to London on a false passport and said he was chained to the top of the door of his cell by his wrists for 22 hours, beaten with a wooden stick, and a gun was put to his head."

He needed basic training as an aid worker, so he went to Afghanistan for six weeks? Doesn't seem like an obvious place for training as an aid worker.

And let's see: he was trying to fly back to London on a false passport. Now, it seems to me that if he was holding a false passport, the authorities would want to investigate his background, hence the questions, as quoted on the Today programme, that he said MI5 fed to the interrogators, questions like, his address, his job, his associates. Someone who had just come from Afghanistan, trying to fly out of Pakistan on a false passport and he thinks it's somehow highly irregular for the British authorities to become involved to try to establish his true identity and background?

Binyam Mohamed appears to contradict himself quite a lot here on significant details. He needed basic training as an aid worker and joined an Afghan camp for six weeks or he "he left Britain for Afghanistan in May 2001 to learn more about his religion," or were these different trips? One where he went to be trained as an aid worker and one where he went to learn about his religion?

In the interview aired by the Today programme Mohamed was asked why he had gone to Afghanistan. He said that people had told him that Afghanistan was where the "real Islam," was to be found. Really? What people? Well, he was quite vague about who these people were, but I would have thought that "real Islam," could be found elsewhere, like Pakistan, maybe, and in studying his religion there, he might have avoided the ongoing problems in Afghanistan, but then he was arrested because of his false passport, I believe. I think this was what drew the attention of the authorities. So, I would ask again: why the need for a false passport if he was just trying to find out about his religion and this was just a totally innocent trip?

Those who have nothing to hide don't need to travel on false passports. The Today programme did not air the full interview and if the question of the passport was raised, it wasn't in the extracts we heard this morning. I would hope that the judicial enquiry would focus on this issue and also on the issue of Mohamed's remaining in the UK. He has not been tried and so he has not been found guilty of any offence, but then neither has he been found innocent.

Eligibility bill hits Congress while court in California decides that the Secretary of State has no ministerial duty to check candidates' eligibility

World Net Daily 13/03/09

By Drew Zahn
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

U.S. Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla.

A freshman representative has introduced a bill to the U.S. Congress that would require presidential candidates to provide a birth certificate and other documents to prove their eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.

Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., filed H.R. 1503, an amendment to the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, which increased required campaign fund disclosure and was later amended to establish the Federal Elections Commission.

According to the Library of Congress' bill-tracking website, H.R. 1503 would "require the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the office of president to include with the committee's statement of organization a copy of the candidate's birth certificate, together with such other documentation as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution."

George Cecala, a spokesperson for Rep. Posey's office, told WND that constituents had been calling, questioning whether Barack Obama – who has publicized a Certificate of Live Birth, but not his official birth certificate – has demonstrated that he meets the Constitution's requirement to be a natural-born citizen.

"Those are legitimate constitutional concerns," Cecala said. "Folks have brought the issue up, and the court really hasn't clarified. And I think American citizens have a right to have answers from their government."

Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 325,000 others and sign up now!

"When seven-year-olds play soccer in Brevard County, to be in Little League they have to prove their residency," Cecala said. "To be president there are three requirements: one is citizenship, two is the age of 35, and three, you have to have been a resident for 14 years. We're simply saying when you file your statement of candidacy with the FEC, you should also file documentation that you fulfill the three requirements to be president.

"There's two standards here," Cecala told WND, "one for Little League and one for president."

"Opponents of President Bush used the 2000 election results and the court decisions to question the legitimacy of President Bush to serve as president," explained Rep. Posey in an official statement. "Opponents of President Obama are raising the birth certificate issue as a means of questioning his eligibility to serve as president. Neither of these situations is healthy for our republic. This bill, by simply requiring such documentation for future candidates for president will remove this issue as a reason for questioning the legitimacy of a candidate elected as president."

Cecala further told WND that there's no political motivation in proposing the bill, and the Congressman hopes passing the bill will help clear the air for the president, enabling the government to get beyond the election controversy to dealing with the nation's other important issues.

"Once we pass this bill, we can be assured that future elections won't have this problem," Cecala said. "It's not an attack on President Obama; it's just clarifying for future elections."

Cecala also explained that if passed, the amendment to election law would require Obama, just like any other candidate, to provide a birth certificate in any future presidential elections.

H.R. 1503 has been referred to the House Committee on House Administration.

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Although Obama officials have told WND all such allegations are "garbage," here is a partial listing and status update for some of the cases over Obama's eligibility:

• New Jersey attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed a case on behalf of Charles Kerchner and others alleging Congress didn't properly ascertain that Obama is qualified to hold the office of president.


• Pennsylvania Democrat Philip Berg has three cases pending, including Berg vs. Obama in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a separate Berg vs. Obama which is under seal at the U.S. District Court level and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, (now dismissed) brought on behalf of a retired military member who could be facing recall to active duty by Obama.
  
  
• Leo Donofrio of New Jersey filed a lawsuit claiming Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court but denied a full hearing.


• Cort Wrotnowski filed suit against Connecticut's secretary of state, making a similar argument to Donofrio. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court, but was denied a full hearing.


• Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of people filing a suit in California, in a case handled by the United States Justice Foundation, that asks the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The case is pending, and lawyers are seeking the public's support.


• Chicago attorney Andy Martin sought legal action requiring Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle to release Obama's vital statistics record. The case was dismissed by Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe.
  
  
• Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan sought a temporary restraining order to stop the Electoral College vote in North Carolina until Barack Obama's eligibility could be confirmed, alleging doubt about Obama's citizenship. His case was denied.
  
  
• In Ohio, David M. Neal sued to force the secretary of state to request documents from the Federal Elections Commission, the Democratic National Committee, the Ohio Democratic Party and Obama to show the presidential candidate was born in Hawaii. The case was denied.
  
  
• Also in Ohio, there was the Greenberg v. Brunner case which ended when the judge threatened to assess all case costs against the plaintiff.
  
  
• In Washington state, Steven Marquis sued the secretary of state seeking a determination on Obama's citizenship. The case was denied.
  
  
• In Georgia, Rev. Tom Terry asked the state Supreme Court to authenticate Obama's birth certificate. His request for an injunction against Georgia's secretary of state was denied by Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter.


• California attorney Orly Taitz has brought a case, Lightfoot vs. Bowen, on behalf of Gail Lightfoot, the vice presidential candidate on the ballot with Ron Paul, four electors and two registered voters.

In addition, other cases cited on the RightSideofLife blog as raising questions about Obama's eligibility include:

• In Texas, Darrel Hunter vs. Obama later was dismissed.
  
  
• In Ohio, Gordon Stamper vs. U.S. later was dismissed.
  
  
• In Texas, Brockhausen vs. Andrade.
  
  
• In Washington, L. Charles Cohen vs. Obama.
  
  
• In Hawaii, Keyes vs. Lingle, dismissed.

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Alan Keyes

A California court has ruled that apparently anyone can run for president on the California ballot – whether or not they are eligible under the Constitution of the United States.

"Secretary of State Debra Bowen contends that there is no basis for mandamus relief because the Secretary of State has no 'ministerial duty' to demand detailed proof of citizenship from presidential candidates," said Judge Michael P. Kenny. "The court finds this argument persuasive."

(Read the whole article on the WND web site.)

If Rep Posey's bill is passed through Congress, in four years time, if Barack Obama is still president, if none of the current lawsuits has succeeded in requiring Obama to produce proof of eligibility, he would be required, at that time, to produce the appropriate documentation were he to stand for re-election.

Videos from Lutonistan

What on earth is going on in Luton? This past week we've had the vile abuse of troops returning from Iraq. I found this video from 2008 and just had one of those "what the fuck," moments. What on earth is this horrendous rabble about?



Then, there's this one where it appears that naked men are writhing around in some kind of ludicrous display of hysteria.



So, now I return to the goings-on this week in Lutonistan when those soldiers, who were given the freedom of the city some time ago for their service, were subjected to abuse as they marched through the streets. It seems that the protest was not very welcome to most of those who had turned out to watch the march. Well done those people of Luton, who took action and demonstrated quite clearly that this vile behaviour was insulting and totally unacceptable.

On International Women's Day Fear of death stalks Pakistani women in Swat

Extracts from AFP article on the women of Swat under Sharia law.

AFP March 7th 2009

Nearly 100 years after the annual day was created to mark the struggle for equal rights for half the world's population, most women in Swat look blank and go silent when asked about gender rights and discrimination.

Last month, the Pakistan government signed a widely criticised agreement with a pro-Taliban cleric to enforce sharia law in exchange for a ceasefire in a region where most locals say the Taliban have become the masters.

Militants have destroyed 191 schools in the valley, 122 of them for girls, leaving 62,000 pupils with nowhere to study, local officials say.

Huma Batool -- not her real name -- is a 42-year-old mother of two who dices with death to teach girls at a private school in the region's main town Mingora.

"We have to veil ourselves and wear shuttlecock burqas. We are not safe even at home. We fear the Taliban all the time. Life is becoming worse and worse for women in Swat," she told AFP by telephone.

Educated and financially self-sufficient, she cannot even pop to the shops without a male relative, leaving her frequently couped up at home for hours, waiting for a suitable escort to become available.

"You cannot imagine how I manage to get to school, practically every day I think about leaving the job and sitting at home."

I will try not to whinge when I have to scrape frost off my car and the heavy morning traffic means that I take 45 minutes to drive 20 miles to the school I work at. This woman, who bravely runs a school for girls has to wait for a male relative to escort her before she leaves her home.

From Atlas Shrugs the brilliantly informative blog by Pamela Geller, I am picking out just a few of Pamela's posts in support of women.

In the UK, a gym class at a private school for girls has been forced to close because Muslim parents have complained about there being boy members. Now, I know that boys can be a real nuisance. Research is said to show that boys demand more attention, but there were only 35 boys included in the 250 members. It seems to me that those Muslim parents should be looking closer to home when thinking about boys in that class.

In my experience as a teacher with over 30 years experience, the boys who are, generally, the biggest pain in the bum are the Muslim boys. In Muslim households, boys tend to be treated much better than their sisters, who are often expected to wait on them like servants. I once came across a five year-old Muslim boy, lying on a couch, with a baby's bottle in his mouth, while his younger sister fetched his shoes for him. He lay there like a fat maggot, sucking baby formula from a bottle that almost disappeared into his fat chops. Yuk! Muslim parents, teach your boys to respect girls and women and then you might see that there really is no harm in a few boys doing gymnastics together with girls.

Daily Mail

Colin Perry, who runs the Shirley Gymnastics Club, said he was saddened by the decision which he said compromised the school's commitment to multiculturalism because of fears of offending a minority.

He is now desperately searching for a new home for the club's 250 members - including 36 boys - which had held mixed-sex classes at the junior school site of Old Palace School, in Croydon, South London, since January last year.

Aqsa Parvez

A young woman living in Canada, who was killed by her father, aided by her own brother, because she wanted to live a life of freedom, like the rest of her classmates. She was buried in a grave marked only by a number and Atlas Shrugs has steadfastly campaigned for a headstone to mark the life of this young woman.

In spite of opposition from Aqsa's family, who seem more concerned about their so-called "honour," in Islamic terms than that Aqsa's own father murdered her, there will be a memorial for Aqsa.

Aqsa Memorial

Hallelujah! Deepest thanks and gratitude to Atlas reader and Fire Chief, Town of Pelham, Scott McLeod, a wonderful man who contacted one of his Municipal Councilors regarding an Aqsa memorial. Councilor Sharon Cook presented a motion to offer an area in the Pelham Peace Park for a suitable Memorial. Sharon Cook, you are a righteous woman!

Yesterday Scott wrote, (To Pamela Geller)

".....on Monday, this week the council of the Town of Pelham passed a resolution to install a memorial to Aqsa Parvez in Peace Park in Fonthill (Smaller community within the Town) We expect to be ready some time later in the year and it likely will be placed in one of the areas where people rest during the day. As indicated before, I will send photo's of the general area where we propose to locate the memorial. I have requested the Clerk of the Town create a copy of the resolution and approval in PDF, which I will then forward to you."

“She wanted to live her life the way she wanted to, not the way her parents wanted her to,” classmate Krista Garbhet said.
“She just wanted to be herself, honestly she just wanted to show her beauty, and not be pushed around by her parents telling her what she has to be like, what she has to do. Nobody would want to do that.”

Over the fall of 2007, Aqsa Parvez shuttled between friends’ houses and youth shelters. She was afraid to go home. Her father, Muhammad, was enraged because she refused to obey his rules. He swore he would kill her.

On the morning of December 10, Aqsa huddled in a Missis­sauga bus shelter with another Grade 11 student, a girl she had been staying with for the past couple of days. They had plenty of time to make it to their first class at Apple­wood Heights Secondary School. As they waited, Aqsa’s 26-year-old brother Waqas, a tow-truck driver, showed up at the bus stop. He said that she should come home and get a fresh change of clothes if she was going to be staying elsewhere. Aqsa hesitated, then got into his car.

Less than an hour later, Muhammad Parvez phoned 911 and told the dispatcher that he had killed his daughter. Within minutes, police and paramedics arrived at 5363 Longhorn Trail, a winding suburban street near Eglinton and Hurontario, and found Aqsa unconscious in her bedroom. The 16-year-old wasn’t breathing. The para­medics started CPR, found a faint pulse, and rushed her to Credit Valley Hospital, 10 minutes west. A few hours later, she was transferred to SickKids and put on life support. She died just after 10 that evening. The official cause was “neck compression”—strangulation. (more here)

Atlas also highlights the story of Ameneh Bahrami, who was blinded in an acid attack by a spurned suitor.

(For seriously disturbing photos, visit Atlas Shrugs)

"Madrid, Spain (CNN)- An Iranian woman living in Spain is welcoming a Tehran court ruling that awards her eye-for-an-eye justice against a suitor who blinded her.

In a Spanish radio interview, she says her aim isn't revenge -- it's to make sure her suffering isn't repeated.

Ameneh Bahrami was blinded and disfigured in 2004 when a man she had spurned threw acid on her. Late last year, an Iranian court reportedly ruled that Islamic justice calls for the attacker to be blinded with acid, too.

But the victim says she is entitled to blind Majid Movahedi in only one eye, because under Iranian law "each man is worth two women."

She also says he would be blinded by having several drops of acid put into one eye, whereas she had acid splashed all over her face and other parts of her body.

She says she's waiting for a letter from the court telling her to go back to Iran for the punishment to be carried out.

Bahrami tells CNN she first crossed paths with her attacker Movahedi in 2002, when they attended the same university. She was a 24-year-old electronics student. He was 19. She never noticed him until they shared a class. He sat next to her one day and brushed up against her. Bahrami says she knew it wasn't an accident.

"I moved away from him," she said, "but he brushed up against me again." When Bahrami stood up in class and screamed for him to stop, Movahedi just looked at her in stunned silence. Bahrami said that over the next two years, Movahedi kept harassing her and making threats, even as he asked her to marry him.

Then one day she was leaving work and he snuck up behind her. When she turned around he threw acid on her face."

Stop abuse of chimps: University of Louisiana research centre abuses chimps.

Chimpanzees are an endangered species, but the New Iberia Research Centre at the University of Louisiana, Lafayette, has 300 of these animals, which they use for invasive research, mostly for pharmaceutical companies. The Humane Society of America made an undercover video of treatment of the chimpanzees at this research centre. As a result of this undercover investigation, the Great Ape Protection Act has just been reintroduced in Congress.



Humane Society US

"A nine-month-long undercover investigation by The HSUS has exposed the mistreatment of nearly 300 chimpanzees and other primates at the New Iberia Research Center (NIRC) in Louisiana. These chimps, living lives of deprivation and misery, are among the more than 1,000 chimps languishing in laboratories across the United States. Chimps, our closet genetic relative, are complex, social, and long-lived creatures. Many chimps currently warehoused in research facilities have lived for decades behind bars. Especially heartbreaking are stories of the 26 elder chimps at NIRC, who were taken from their mothers in the wild.

The Great Ape Protection Act (H.R. 1326) has just been re-introduced in Congress. This legislation aims to end invasive research on the chimpanzees remaining in laboratories, retire the approximately 500 federally-owned chimpanzees to permanent sanctuary (including the elder chimps at NIRC), and make the recent decision by the National Center for Research Resources (part of the National Institutes of Health) to stop funding the breeding of federally-owned chimpanzees permanent."

Dr Orly Taitz may be on the home straight, helped by Obama himself!

Dr Taitz has filed a Pre-Litigation letter to Attorney General Holder, with plaintiffs who would appear to have "standing" to file suit against Barack Obama for disclosure of his documents relating to his eligibility to be POTUS.

"Attorney General, Eric H. Holder Jr.

U.S. Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20530-0001 USA

March 1, 2009

Honorable Attorney General Holder

Re: Request a Special Assistant for the United States to relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama, II to Test His Title to President before the Supreme Court

Relators, Major General Carroll Childers, Ret; Lt. Col Dr. David Earl-Graef; Navy and Police officer Mr. Clinton Grimes; Lt. Scott Easterling, currently serving in Iraq; Major James Cannon, US Marine Corps, Ret; New Hampshire State Representative Mr. Timothy Comerford; Tennessee State Representative Mr. Frank Nicely, State of Alabama 2008 electoral college elector Mr. Robert Cusanelli bring information for Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama, II, testing his title to President per attached relation. Relators include:

Robert Cusanelli, Elector for 7th District, State of Alabama, in the 2008 Electoral College;

Frank Nicely, State Representative of Tennessee in his official capacity;

Timothy Comerford, State Representative of New Hampshire in his official capacity;

Major General Carroll Childers, 29th Infantry Div VA retired, lifetime subject to recall; Numerous decorations

1st Lt. Scott R. Easterling OD LG US Army on active duty in Iraq;

Clint Grimes, Sergeant Long Beach Police Officer & CDR/0-5 US Navy (Active Reserve). Numerous decorations, including two National defense medals, two Navy commendation medals

Dr. David Earl-Graef, Lieutenant Colonel Air Force MC, Military Surgeon- Active Reserve. Numerous decorations including Air Force outstanding unit with valor.

James Cannon Major US Marine Corps, Ret, lifetime subject to recall. Numerous awards, including Bronze Star with combat V and two Purple Hearts

Relator’s oath of office grants standing. Relators are affected by actions of Respondent Obama and the outcome of this Quo Warranto, and thus have interest above citizens.

Information on Quo Warranto against a Federal Officer is normally related to the Attorney General to raise on behalf of the United States in U.S. District court of the District of Columbia per DC Code 16-3502. However, the Attorney General defends the office of President and is appointed by the President. For the Attorney General to bring Quo Warranto on the President raises an intrinsic conflict of interest. USAM 3-2.170 Historically, a Special Prosecutor or Independent Counsel was appointed to eliminate such conflicts of interest, e.g., Attorney General Elliot Richardson appointed Archibald Cox as the Watergate Special Prosecutor over issues touching on President Nixon.

This information on Quo Warranto includes action between the United States ex rel. and the State of Hawaii over original birth records of Barack H. Obama II being withheld per Hawaii’s privacy laws. Hawaii’s action obstructs the constitutional duties of election officers to validate or evaluate President Election Obama qualifications to become President under U.S. CONST. art II - 1 and Amend. XX – 3.

As President Elect, Respondent Obama failed to submit prima facie evidence of his qualifications before January 20, 2009. Election officers failed to challenge, validate or evaluate his qualifications. Relators submit that as President Elect, Respondent Obama failed qualify per U.S. CONST. Amend. XX – 3.

Such negligence and misprision threaten to nullify these essential safeguards. Thus Relators request this Quo Warranto be related to the Supreme Court under its original jurisdiction.

Enclosed is a summary motion for leave to file Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama II aka Barry Soetoro, with the Supreme Court. The list of Questions Presented is attached. A full brief supporting this motion is in preparation.

1) Relators respectfully pray that the Attorney General recuse himself over bringing this Quo Warranto for the United States on Barack H. Obama II, by reason of intrinsic conflict of interest.

2) Relators pray the Attorney General appoint a Special Assistant (prosecutor) of Archibald Cox’s reputation and expertise, to relate this Quo Warranto to the Supreme Court per 28 USC 543.

3) Relators request that their attorney, Orly Taitz, ESQ DDS, assist in relating this Quo Warranto, being recognized at bar before the Supreme Court.

4) Relators further request the assistance of Patrick Fitzgerald, United States Attorney General for the Northern District of Illinois, as having familiarity with issues involving Barack H. Obama II while Senator from Illinois and as President Elect.

5) Relators request guidance from the Attorney General, within one week of receipt of this information, regarding his decision on whether to appoint such a Special Assistant.

With respect, in absence of such guidance, Relators will proceed to request leave from the Supreme Court to relate information for this Quo Warranto on Mr. Obama to test his title.

Yours Sincerely,

Orly Taitz, ESQ

Attorney for Relators

Encl. Motion to Supreme Court for leave to relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama II, testing his title to the Federal office of President."

http://defendourfreedoms.us/

When Philip Berg filed suit against Barack Obama last year, demanding that Obama produce his birth certificate and prove his eligibility to be president of the United States, the suit was dismissed for Berg's "lack of standing," to bring such an action. Dozens of other suits have been filed, none of which seems to have progressed very far, either for lack of standing or bureaucratic stalling. Dr Taitz now has 101 plaintiffs, 9 of whom are serving military people, 3 in Iraq, and some on active recall.

If officers of the military, active or on active recall, whose lives can be affected by the president's decisions as Commander in Chief do not have standing, then who does? Who has the right to challenge the person sitting in the White House as president? In my opinion, Barack Obama should show respect for the citizens of his country and just produce the documents which are being requested.

Anyway, folks, a very interesting post on the Lame Cherry blog yesterday. It appears that Barack Obama and his unworthy crew may not have the foresight to see how a certain action may have repercussions for the president. In releasing memos written by George Bush, Obama seems to have opened the way for Dr Orly Taitz's lawsuit since Obama has waived presidential executive privilege. I will post the Lame Cherry article as it stands, rather than try to paraphrase it. Well worth a careful read!

Lame Cherry blogspot

"I highly doubt the lawyers taking up the Obama eligibility cases have noticed that Barack Obama has just laid their golden goose egg in the most inept decision of his administration led by his Justice Department in Eric Holder.

What I mean by this is today in a malevolent, low grade prick move, of leftist origins, Barack Obama released a ton of Bush White House memos concerning executive policy decisions.
Executive privilege is something all Presidents guard with their last breaths, because all executives have something to hide as being President is a dirty job. This is the reason all Presidents in protecting their own future butts with both hands do not ever release past Presidential workings.

Barack Obama though has done just that in a mean spirited, liberal, cutting off your nose to spite your own face. Obama and the goons "think" they are setting a political fire to once again deflect heat from them and instead focus it on George W. Bush to feed him as meat to the liberal press as a continuing Davide Letterman hate object.
The problem in this which I doubt anyone has noticed is Barack Obama by doing this, releasing personal memos, executive discussions and decisions, has opened up his entire political entree in everything he has done since he decided to be President as that is Executive which has legal precedent concerning Richard Nixon in the Committee to Re Elect the President.

See by Birdie Obama doing what he did, now all the smear and quip pro quo which the Obama camp engaged in against John Edwards where the press was fed information to go after Edwards instead of Obama's sexcapades is open to freedom of information.
This means Lawrence Sinclair has legal right to all of Barack Obama notes, files and memos concerning him and anything Obama, his staff or "outsiders" contracted to engage in, for the courts to pour through and find.
This means that Barack Obama's birth certificate, passport, college records, writings from college and all personal information are now subject to access to courts as he was waived the executive and personal privilege right by releasing Bush documents.

Barack Obama is an idiot and I would personally like to thank him for his and his people's political suicide binge they are intent upon for themselves.

As Obama has executive problems in court actions he is now engaged in, this brings this all into the White House in past history which was protected under the law, such as passports and college records. Every last detail is now subject to subpoena and Freedom of Information Act.
The only records the Citizen nor courts can get their hands on are National Security issues, and, there is no way Lawrence Sinclair, Obama's passport, John Edwards or just what Joe Biden did o secure his choice of jobs with Obama is covered.
There are now no confidential conversations nor memos as Obama has waved this for George Bush 43 when Obama leaked to the press confidential conversations and now with the release of Presidential documents.

So Orly Taitz and company, the balls are bouncing in your court. There are legal precedents from Richard Nixon being hounded to now Barack Obama handing the entire game to those seeking to find the Truth on Birdie Obama.

Thanks Birdie, but I still doubt these chickens have figured out the egg you just laid.

agtG Posted by Lame Cherry at 4:49 PM "

From sea to shining sea: the new American tea party

Rick Santelli, former trader and financial executive is the one who started the ball rolling, or the tea bag brewing, for tea parties to be held all over the United States. When Obama spokesman, Robert Gibbs, suggested giving Santelli a "cup of decaf," Santelli responded that he'd rather have a cup of tea and the tea party idea was born.

Daily Telegraph UK blog

"An on-air editor for CNBC and former trader and financial executive, Santelli's recent live broadcast - self-described as a rant - from the floor of the Chicago Board of Trade gave voice to populist rage about Obama's economic policies and electrified conservatives. His suggestion there should be a modern-day version of the Boston Tea Party has inspired conservatives to hold protest tea parties across America today and instantaneously propelled him to national prominence.

Santelli on Obama: "This is America! How many of you people want to pay for your neighbors' mortgage that has an extra bathroom and can't pay their bills? ... President Obama, are you listening?" Obama's spokesman Robert Gibbs on Santelli: "I feel assured that Mr. Santelli doesn't know what he's talking about... I'd be happy to buy him a cup of coffee - decaf."

Tea parties already held:

Washington, DC

Feb. 27
12-2 pm: White House (VENUE CHANGE)

Los Angeles, CA

Feb.27

9:00am - 10:00am: Santa Monica Pier
Contact: Moxie - moxie@moxie.nu
Facebook

Atlanta, GA

Feb. 27
12-1 pm: Washington St., side of the Georgia State Capitol
Contact: mmealling@masten-space.com

Cleveland, OH

Feb. 27
12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EST: 1 Public Square, Cleveland, OH 44113
Website

St. Louis, MO

Feb. 27
11:00am-12:00pm - The Steps of Arch
Wharf Street, St. Louis, MO
Contact: bill@hennessysview.com
Facebook

Springfield, MO

Feb. 27
12:00 pm - 1:00 pm: Lake Springfield Park, Springfield, MO
Contact: thedangerousone@live.com
Info

Houston, TX

Feb. 27
11:00am - 2:00pm
Where: Fondren Green at Discovery Green Park, in front of Amphitheatre.
Houston, TX
Contact: fcravens1@peoplepc.com

Fort Worth, TX

Feb. 27
3:00pm-7:00pm: The Cowtown Bar & Grill on 7108 Camp Bowie Blvd Fort Worth, TX 76116
Contact: (817) 570-7910
Website

San Diego, CA

Feb. 27
9:00 am - 10:00 am
San Diego Bay - just north of the Star of India, San Diego, CA
Contact: 619-606-0337
Organizer: Dawn Wildman of the Neighborhood Republican Club
Info

Jackson, MI

Feb. 27
11:00am-1:30pm: Where: Capital Building steps in Jackson
Starts with a meet and greet for an hour.

Seattle, WA

12:15 pm - 1:15 pm: Westlake Park, 410 Pine St. by the big arch.
Organizer: Keli Carendar
WHAT TO BRING: We are having a real tea party during lunch, so bring your lunch, a seat, a blanket; bring a cup of tea (or coffee, sshhh we won’t tell), a hat, an umbrella, your sense of fun and patriotism. Most importantly, bring a box of tea bags. We will provide you with Little Liberty Tea Wrappers printed with messages to President Obama that you can sign. We will then collect all of the tea bags and send them on to Washington D.C. Also, if you can bring a pen and maybe a stapler…that would help.
More info

Fort Meyers Beach, FL

Feb. 27

11:30am-1:00pm: Bowditch Point Park, 50 Estero Blvd., Fort Myers Beach, FL
Contact: katraky@gmail.com
Info

Wichita, KS

Feb. 27
11:30 pm - 12:30 pm: Farm Credit Bank Building, 245 N. Waco, Wichita, KS
Contact: renaissancelady46@yahoo.com
Info

Kansas City, MO

Feb. 28
One mile walk to Senator Claire McCaskill’s office.
10:00am: J.C. Nichols Fountain, 47th and J.C. Nichols Parkway
Email: KansasCityTeaParty@yahoo.com

Many more planned. For info:

http://newamericanteaparty.com/?page_id=78

DCTea Party: Joe the Plumber



St Louis Tea Party

Dr Alan Keyes: Stop Obama or US will cease to exist.

Dr Alan Keyes gained his PhD in Government Affairs from Harvard University and is an acknowledged expert on the US Constitution. Listen to what he says about Barack Obama's birth certificate and his eligibility to be president of the United States.



Dr. Orly Taitz is the principal attorney behind the Keyes lawsuit and founder of Defend Our Freedoms Foundation. Dr. Taitz was born in the Former Soviet Union.

http://defendourfreedoms.us/

The most recent person to join Dr Taitz's action against Barack Obama is a military officer, serving in Iraq. Details on Orly's site. Here is an extract from the officer's letter:

"To Any and All Interested Parties,

As an active-duty Officer in the United States Army, I have grave concerns about the constitutional eligibilty of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the Office of President of The United States. He has absolutely refused to provide to the American public his original birth certificate, as well as other documents which may prove or disprove his eligibility. In fact, he has fought every attempt made by concerned citizens in their effort to force him to do so.

Until Mr. Obama releases a "vault copy" of his original birth certificate for public review, I will consider him neither my Commander in Chief nor my President, but rather, a usurper to the Office - an impostor.

My conviction is such that I am compelled to join Dr. Orly Taitz's lawsuit, as a plaintiff, against Mr. Obama. As a citizen, it pains me to do this, but as an Offficer, my sworn oath to support and defend our Constitution requires this action."

Dr Ron Polarik, speaking about the forensic investigation of the certificate for Barack Obama which was presented on the internet. This is the only certificate to have been produced.



And the wonderful Dr David Manning of the Atlah (formerly Harlem) ministry.

What Islam is not.

My thanks go to Dr Alan Clifford of Norwich Reformed Church for bringing this video to my attention.

From Seattle to Denver to Mesa Arizona. Another protest today against the "Porkulus" spending plan.

It seems that there is a rising tide of protest against president Obama's Stimulus Plan. Today, Obama will visit Mesa Arizona and be met with protesters. All is not well in Obama La-La Land what with all the lawsuits currently being filed about his eligibility and Stephen Pidgeon's National Grand Jury Declaration

"Pursuant to First Amendment (The right of the people peaceably to assemble), the Ninth Amendment (The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people), and the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America (The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people), this National Grand Jury is convened by natural born citizens of the fifty several states and of the United States of America, seating 50 jurors pursuant to the duties, powers, responsibilities, qualifications as established hereunder for the following purposes:

• To examine all aspects of the federal government by initiating its own investigations.
• To serve as ombudsmen for the citizens of the country in respect to constitutional rights. and privileges established under the organic documents of the United States of America, as properly amended from time to time.
• To conduct criminal investigations of members of the federal government, and, if the evidence is sufficient, issue criminal indictments."

Then there's Larry Sinclair's book, "Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder." Larry took delivery of the first few hundred copies of the first edition this week, for signing, numbering and sending out. The book will be available to the general public in book stores from March 1st.

I don't know what has happened to Larry's site this morning. There seems to be a blank white page where the articles were. Has Larry's site been hacked? He's certainly had a great many threats, both about the book and about the site.

Watch the news video here of the protest in Seattle:

http://www.kirotv.com/video/18727718/index.html

Denver Anti-Stimulus Rally and Pig Roast.





Bruce Jacobs of KFYI on the planned "Mock Demonstration," for the Obama visit to Mesa, Arizona. Information about the protest, gathering area etc, can be found on the KFYI web site

Barack Obama: "I'll make our government open and transparent."

Transcript of the video:

(Please watch this video with reference to the video I posted on Friday February 13th, of John Boehner talking about members of Congress having 12 hours, from midnight, to read through 1100 pages of the "Stimulus Bill," before voting on it.)

Barack Obama "Public Will Have 5 Days To Look At Every Bill That Lands On My Desk"

Obama said:

"I'll also be instituting an absolute ???? (can't make out the word) so that no registered lobbyist of this ???? (and again!) can curry favour with members of my administration based on how much they can spend on a fancy dinner.

I'll make our government open and transparent so that anyone can ensure that our business is the people's business.

Just as Louis Brandeis once said, "Sunlight is the greatest disinfectant," and as president I'm gonna make it impossible for Congressmen or lobbyists to slip pork barrel projects (*) or corporate welfare into laws when no one's looking because when I'm president, meetings where laws are written will be more open to the public: no more secrecy. That's a committment I make to you as president.

No more secrecy.

And when there's a bill that ends up on my desk as president, you the public will have five days to look online and find out what's in it before I sign it so that you know what your government's doing.

When there are meetings between lobbyists and a government agency, we'll put as many as po...as many of those meetings as possible online for every American to watch.

When there's a tax bill being debated in Congress, you will know the names of the corporations that would benefit and how much money they would get and we will put every corporate tax break and every pork barrel project online for every American to see and you can decide whther your representative's actually representing you."

The Stimulus Bill broke 7 Obama promises.

1. Make government open and transparent.

2. Make it "impossible" for Congressmen to slip in pork barrel projects.

3. Meetings where laws are written will be more open to the public. (Even Congressional Republicans shut out.)

4. No more secrecy.

5. Public will have 5 days to look at a bill.

6. You’ll know what’s in it.

7. We will put every pork barrel project online.

(*) Pork barrel projects:Typically, "pork" involves funding for government programs whose economic or service benefits are concentrated in a particular area but whose costs are spread among all taxpayers. Public works projects, certain national defense spending projects, and agricultural subsidies are the most commonly cited examples.

Trillion Dollar Spending Bill - 1100 pages that no one gets the time to read!